Legal Opinion

Shartzer v. Ulmer

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1959No. 6426PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of J. B. Ulmer, plaintiff (appellee), in the sum of $5,075 for damages against defendants D. O. Shartzer (appellant) and one Tom H. Spargo. For the sake of clarity the only two parties to this appeal will be designated either by name or as appellant and appellee, while the other defendant Spargo, who has not appealed, will be called by his surname.

The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, and while no formal findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested or made, the records of the trial court do disclose the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gruber v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Kee v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Loader v. Bank of IdanaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Vose v. WhitneyMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Tacke v. HauserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Autoville, Inc. v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. Focal Point, Inc. v. U-Haul Co. of Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Valder Law Offices v. Keenan Law FirmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Fendler v. Texaco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API