Legal Opinion

Southern Provisions, Inc. v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1981No. 80-986PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON

Harris Trust and Savings Bank instituted an action against North Bank for breach of warranty of good title. The trial court found that North Bank had breached its warranty, but held that Harris Bank was not entitled to attorney’s fees and litigation costs under section 4 — 207(3) of the Uniform Commercial Code.

On appeal, Harris Trust and Savings Bank claims that the trial court erred in denying its request for attorney’s fees and litigation costs.

We affirm.

On September 1, 1978, Southern Provisions, Inc. (Southern Provisions), issued a check in the amount of $2,500 payable to Ben Wilkerson.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pastor v. National Republic Bank of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Riedel v. First Nat. Bank of Or.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Pastor v. NAT'L REPUBLIC BK. OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McAdam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. ADVOCATE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORP. v. Bank One, NAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. FIRST NAT. BANK IN HARVEY v. Colonial BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Kobuszewski v. ScriberLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. First Virginia Bank-Colonial v. Provident State BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API