Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Roach Cadillac, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1981No. 52,364PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fromme, J.:

This action was brought under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, K.S.A. 50-623 et seq., the plaintiff Daniel J. Watkins alleging that Roach Leasing, Inc., and others, had committed a deceptive consumer sales practice. The original defendants, Roach Cadillac, Inc. and General Motors Acceptance Corporation, were dismissed from the action prior to trial. The action proceeded against Roach Leasing, Inc. After trial was had to the court, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for $2,000.00 civil penalty and $3,000.00 for attorney fees. Roach Leasing, Inc. appeals the judgment for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
  3. Callaway v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Farm & City Insurance v. American Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Lakeview Gardens, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. SchneiderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Finstad v. Washburn UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. DEBRA F. FINK v. Ricoh Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  4. Manley v. Wichita Business CollegeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Weigel v. Ron Tonkin Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API