Legal Opinion
Krisel v. Duran
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 28, 1969No. 65 Civ. 2702PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
The basic facts upon which plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant Phillips Petroleum Company [Phillips] liable are set forth in this Court’s earlier opinion dismissing the action against the Economic Development Administration of Puerto Rico [EDA] on the jurisdictional ground that EDA was an instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and that since the Commonwealth was the real party in interest, diversity jurisdiction was lacking.1
Familiarity is assumed with the prior opinion, which noted that although plaintiff had no dealings with Phillips, his claims…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vantage Point, Inc. v. Parker Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Smith v. Recrion CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- American Ex. Is. Lin., Inc. S/S Exp. Amb. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Wanner v. SatranDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1986
- Krisel v. DuranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.