Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 7, 1980No. 21892, CA 14836PublishedCited by 6 opinions

BUTTLER, P. J.

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiff-buyer appeals from the decree of the trial court denying him relief after the defendants declared a forfeiture under a contract for the sale of land. We reverse.

Plaintiff and defendants entered into an earnest money agreement on August 29,1976, in which plaintiff agreed to buy and defendants to sell five acres of land in Deschutes county for $12,500. The earnest money agreement was a printed form on which the particular terms of the sale were filled in by the parties. It provided that the sellers "have this day sold to the * * * purchaser” the described land, possession to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Johnson v. BernsOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Southworth v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Seal v. PolehnOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hull v. CLEMENSOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Honeyman v. ClostermannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Wallstreet Properties, Inc. v. GassnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Cook v. DeslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Walker v. FeiringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. White v. RehnIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API