Legal Opinion

Oldham v. Fanno

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2000No. 97-CV-0066; CA A101682PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment that declared that plaintiffs have control of a freestanding signpost that is located on land defendants lease from plaintiffs and that denied relief on defendants’ counterclaim for breach of the parties’ lease. They assign error to the trial court’s conclusion that the lease gives plaintiffs control over the signpost. They also assign error to the trial court’s finding that they failed to prove damages for plaintiffs’ breach of the lease. We reverse as to the declaration but affirm as to the counterclaim for damages.

Defendants operate a secondhand store…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Alberson v. Elk Creek Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. KimballOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bend Tarp and Liner, Inc. v. BundyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BoyarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Delta Logistics, Inc. v. Employment Department Tax SectionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Phillips v. RathboneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Marshall v. CannadyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API