Legal Opinion

Alberson v. Elk Creek Mining Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Union : Robert Eakin, Judge. Action of replevin by J. L. Alberson against the Elk Creek Gold Mining Company to recover possession of sundry chattels that he might foreclose a chattel mortgage thereon. The facts in detail appear in the opinion of the court. Defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

W. T. Wright, J. C. Moreland, and J. T. Wright, being the owners of á mine known as the “Robert Emmet Quartz Lode,” entered into an agreement with John H. and Frank J. Davey, August 8, 1899, by the terms of which they executed a deed thereto in favor of the Daveys, and placed the same in escrow, to be delivered to them upon condition that they, enter into possession thereof, do certain development work, and make such improvements as they might deem necessary to put it in a producing condition; they to elect whether they would purchase the same, and accept the deed, within six months. It was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mills v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Sword v. LowIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. StantonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Landigan v. MayerOregon Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blake-McFall Co. v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Montana Electric Co. v. Northern Valley Min. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Washburn v. Inter-Mountain Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Roseburg Nat. Bank v. CampOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State Highway Commission v. Empire Building Material Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API