Legal Opinion

People v. Seely

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1946No. Crim. 4012PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial and also from the judgment herein based upon the jury’s verdict finding him guilty of robbery of the first degree, and of certain prior convictions of a felony; and adjudging him to be an habitual criminal.

It is here urged (1) that the court erred in failing to dismiss the cause under section 1382 of the Penal Code; and (2) that the district attorney was guilty of prejudicial misconduct.

Section 1382 of the Penal Code provides: ‘ ‘ The court, unless good cause to the contrary is shown, must order the prosecution to be dismissed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SantoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. In Re GereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HidalgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. RhoadesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API