Legal Opinion
Paxton v. Spencer
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1928No. 4619PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.
On the 5th day of September, 1924, plaintiffs (appellants) entered into a contract with the state road commission of this state for the construction of a highway in Southern Utah. On the 9th day of September, 1924, the appellants sublet to the defendants (respondents) Walter Spencer, Edward H. Parry, William Pearce, and Archie D. Ryan the construction of a portion of said highway. A written contract bearing that date was entered into between the appellants and respondents. In this contract the work to be done was classified, and the agreed price per cubic yard and per linear foot was named.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Grigsby v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Phoenix Ins. Co. v. DosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Kiernan v. Dutchess County Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bower v. TebbsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Corporation of President of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
- Wasatch Bank of Pleasant Grove v. Surety Insurance Co. of CaliforniaUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Board of Education of Granite School Dist. v. Southern Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930