Legal Opinion
Martin Eisenberg and Arthur Nissen, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Frederick M. Gagnon, Bernard A. Boyers, David E. Wasserstrom, Charles Lieberman, Edward Hershenhorn, David Weinstein, John W. Pelino, Morris L. Chucas, Tom P. Monteverde, Wasserstrom & Chucas, and Pelino, Wasserstrom, Chucas & Monteverde, P.C. v. Gelrod, Fox and Co., Clarence Rainess & Co., Seidman and Seidman, Gruntal and Co., Marvin Welsch and Jack Panich. Appeal of Martin Eisenberg and Arthur Nissen, in Nos. 84-1214 & 84-1225. Appeal of David E. Wasserstrom, in No. 84-1261
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 26, 1985No. 84-1214PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
766 F.2d 770
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,202, 2 Fed.R.Serv.3d 980,
18 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 783
Martin EISENBERG and Arthur Nissen, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated
v.
Frederick M. GAGNON, Bernard A. Boyers, David E.
Wasserstrom, Charles Lieberman, Edward Hershenhorn, David
Weinstein, John W. Pelino, Morris L. Chucas, Tom P.
Monteverde, Wasserstrom & Chucas, and Pelino, Wasserstrom,
Chucas & Monteverde, P.C.
v.
GELROD, FOX AND CO., Clarence Rainess & Co., Seidman and
Seidman, Gruntal and Co., Marvin Welsch and Jack Panich.
Appeal of Martin EISENBERG and Arthur Nissen, in Nos.
84-1214 &…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamilton v. Ohio Sav. BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Simpson v. Specialty Retail ConceptsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Daniels v. Centennial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993