Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Royal Park No. 14, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1993No. 92-1920PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

I

On November 1, 1985, Royal Park No. 14, Ltd., Royal Park No. 20, Ltd., Royal Park Development Corporation, Inc., G.R. Hay and William G. Jones, Jr. (Royal Park) executed and delivered a promissory note to the Bank of Dallas. Hay and Jones also executed and delivered a guaranty agreement under which they guaranteed payment of the original note and any extensions and renewals. The note was secured by a deed of trust.

Royal Park borrowed the money from the Bank of Dallas to construct a building that it planned to lease. Royal Park claims that the Bank of Dallas did not fund…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jack H. Harrison and Frederick G. RixeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Tarrant Savings Association v. Lucky Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Juan Santoni, Jr. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Favero v. Huntsville Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  2. Abu-Awad v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
  3. Ferguson v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Bateman v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  5. Ford-Evans v. United Space Alliance LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API