Legal Opinion
Bateman v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 22, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-11191-MELPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LASKER, District Judge.
Thomas R. Bateman sues the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good-faith and fair dealing, specific performance and declaratory judgment. The claims arise primarily from oral agreements Bateman alleges to have entered into with the FDIC in its capacity as receiver of Malden Trust Company and relate to the settlement of his obligations under a “Replacement Promissory Note.” Bateman moves to amend his complaint to add claims for intentional and negligent misrepresentation, deceit and promissory…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Orell v. UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- TriState HVAC Equipment, LLP v. Big Belly Solar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Petricca v. City of GardnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Petricca v. City of GardnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Mailloux v. Town of LittletonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.