In re Convergent Technologies Second Half 1984 Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
WAYNE D. BRAZIL, United States Magistrate.
In this opinion the court addresses four principal issues: (1) does the fact that a statement taken from a non-party witness is purely factual, or is in the form of a verbatim transcription of her words, disqualify that statement from protection under the work product doctrine? (2) should the court quash a subpoena by which defendants attempt to secure a copy of an adopted statement directly from the non-party who gave the statement to plaintiffs’ counsel? (3) by asking certain non-party witnesses to review, correct and adopt…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Michael N. Mervin v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Robbins Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Hirstein v. American Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
3Cited by20 opinions
- Johnson v. GmeinderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Robinson v. Texas Automobile Dealers Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
- Murphy v. Kmart Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
- United States v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Americold Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.