Legal Opinion

In re Convergent Technologies Second Half 1984 Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 28, 1988No. C 85 20130 SW/WDBPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

WAYNE D. BRAZIL, United States Magistrate.

In this opinion the court addresses four principal issues: (1) does the fact that a statement taken from a non-party witness is purely factual, or is in the form of a verbatim transcription of her words, disqualify that statement from protection under the work product doctrine? (2) should the court quash a subpoena by which defendants attempt to secure a copy of an adopted statement directly from the non-party who gave the statement to plaintiffs’ counsel? (3) by asking certain non-party witnesses to review, correct and adopt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Michael N. Mervin v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  3. Robbins Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Hirstein v. American Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GmeinderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  2. Robinson v. Texas Automobile Dealers Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  3. Murphy v. Kmart Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
  4. United States v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  5. Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Americold Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API