Legal Opinion
Choi v. Chemical Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1996No. 93 Civ. 4237 (DAB)PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
BATTS, District Judge.
Keum Choi brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1954, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, against his employer Chemical Bank (“Chemical” or “the Bank”). Chemical has moved to dismiss this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), and Rules 4(m), 12(b)(4), and 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the alternative, Chemical moves to dismiss particular claims on the grounds that they are time-barred under § 2000e-5(e) of Title VII.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs Discrimination Complaint
Chemical hired Keum Choi…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- McNight v. Dormitory Authority of State of NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Fitzgerald v. HendersonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Briggs v. New York State Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Cable v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.