Williams v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
In his sole point relied on, Gregory D. Williams (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial following an evidentiary hearing of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Rule 24.035, premised on his assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel which caused him to plead guilty to three counts of robbery when, as he maintains, his plea counsel failed to fully ascertain whether he was competent to enter the aforementioned guilty pleas. 1 We affirm the denial of Movant’s postconviction motion.
The record reveals Movant was charged by “Information in a Felony Case” on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Huth v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Butts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Cupp v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Boyd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harper v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013