Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided August 24, 2011No. 06-11-00029-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

The State of Texas asserts on appeal that the time credit given to Larry Burnel Wilson for time Wilson spent in a Substance Abuse Felony Punishment (SAFP) Facility made his sentence illegal. Finding that time credits are not part of the sentence, but merely a credit to the sentence, we conclude we have no jurisdiction to address the State’s attempted appeal regarding the time credits to Wilson’s sentence.

Wilson was adjudicated 1 guilty of aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02(a)(1) (West 2011). The trial court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mizell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Angelo R. Carrillo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  3. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. State v. KershCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carmine Caggiano v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2022
  2. Gilbert Mendez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
  3. the State of Texas v. Manuel R. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API