Legal Opinion
Jamie Gilreath v. Corey Potter, et al.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided October 16, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00037Unknown
1Opinion
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA 3 4 JAMIE GILREATH, 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. Case No. 3:24-cv-00037-SLG-KFR 7 COREY POTTER, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE 11 RENEWED MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 12 Before the Court is a Renewed Motion for Default Judgment as to in personam 13 Defendant Corey Potter (“Renewed Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Jamie Gilreath.1 Defendant 14 Corey Potter did not respond to the Renewed Motion. The Court previously held a default 15 judgment hearing on Plaintiff’s initial motion for default judgment.2 Upon review and 16…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.