Santa Fe Energy Co. v. Baxter
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTSON, Justice.
This is a declaratory judgment case. The sole issue on appeal is whether a tax shifting clause in an oil and gas lease places the burden on the lessee to pay all taxes levied under the Windfall Profit Tax Act of 1980. Appellants, Santa Fe Energy Company and Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. (“Santa Fe”) are the lessors. Appellees, Murphy H. Baxter, John L. Cox, Pioneer Production Corporation and Wing Corporation (“Baxter”) are the lessees. Baxter brought a declaratory judgment action claiming the tax shifting clause in the lease did not place the burden of paying all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. PtasynskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- River Oaks Shopping Center v. PaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Tenneco West, Inc. v. Marathon Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- J.M. Huber Corp. v. Santa Fe Energy Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Wright v. E.P. Operating Ltd. Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1998
- Lee M. Bass, Inc. v. Shell Western E & P, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997