River Oaks Shopping Center v. Pagan
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Irene and Charles Pagan, appellees. The issue to be determined is whether, under Section 171.255 of Texas Tax Code (Vernon 1982), the debt sued upon by appellant, River Oaks Shopping Center, was “created” or “incurred” after the appellees’ corporation forfeited its right to do business in Texas. If the debt was created or incurred after the Pagan Corporation forfeited its right to do business, then appellees, as officers of the corporation, would be individually liable for the debt pursuant to Section 171.255.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
- Roth v. State ex rel. KurtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Steam-Engine Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Curry Auto Leasing, Inc. v. Byrd, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
- The Atrium v. Kenwin Shops of Crockett, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Cain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Expro Americas, LLC v. Sanguine Gas Exploration, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Jonnet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Solomon v. Greenblatt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.