Legal Opinion
Davis v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 1, 1968No. 43371, 43420PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
1. The court did not err in overruling defendant’s general demurrer to Count 2 of the petition. In this connection see Harper v. DeFreitas, 117 Ga. App. 236, 238 (160 SE2d 260); Bazemore v. Burnet, 117 Ga. App. 849 (161 SE2d 924); Reiner v. David’s Super Market, 118 Ga. App. 10 (162 SE2d 298). The petition did not fail to state a claim for the reason that the brokerage agreement did not more fully describe the property and the interest therein to be sold. See Orr v. Smith, 102 Ga. App. 40, 43 (115 SE2d 601).
2. During the trial plaintiff’s counsel expressly abandoned…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Benevolent Burial Ass'n v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Bazemore v. BurnetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Howkins v. Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Wilcox, Gibbs & Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilner's, Inc. v. FineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- City of Atlanta v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Morris v. SAVANNAH VALLEY REALTY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- BAKER MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. HugenbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978