Legal Opinion

Bazemore v. Burnet

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1968No. 43641, 43642, 43643PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

In the arguments of counsel, the defect existing in the premises because the gas pipe in the kitchen was left unplugged was treated as a latent defect. The petitions authorize the inference that the defect was a latent one. If the petitions had affirmatively shown that that condition amounted to a patent defect, recovery would be precluded since a landlord is not liable for injuries to a tenant resulting from a defect existing at the inception of the lease, where the tenant had means of knowledge equal to those of the landlord. Waddell v. Wofford Oil Co., 84 Ga. App. 617…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TapleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Fulton County v. SpratlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cohen v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Bates & Associates, Inc. v. RomeiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Rogers v. Coronet InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Scarboro Enterprises, Inc. v. HirshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Wade v. Polytech Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API