Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Columbia Casualty Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1928No. 20847, 20848 and 20882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

These three proceedings arise under Sections 11768-11787, G-eneral Code. The particular sections involved are 11769 and 1178Í, which read as follows:

Section 1Í769: “After the issue of an execution against property, and on proof by the affidavit of the judgment creditor, or otherwise, to the satisfaction of the court of common pleas, or a judge thereof, or a probate judge, of the county in which the debtor is found, that the judgment debtor has property which he unjustly refuses to apply toward the satisfaction of the judgment, such court or judge, by order, may require the debtor to appear at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Rudd v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Ex parte CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Yutze v. CopelanOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Wise v. ChaneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Inter-Regional Financial Group, Inc. v. Cyrus HashemiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Cornell v. ShainOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Troutman v. EicharOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Elkhart Cooperative Equity Exchange v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  5. Dobbins v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API