Legal Opinion

Ex parte Cohen

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1856PublishedCited by 31 opinions

This was a writ of Habeas Corpus, issued on ttie petition of A. A. Cohen, to the Sheriff of San Francisco county, commanding him to bring before the Court the body of A. A. Cohen, and to show cause why the latter was detained in custody. The facts appearing by the return to the writ, are set forth in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Terry

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

The return to the writ shows that the petitioner is held in custody under a warrant of commitment, issued out of the Fourth District Court, in the case of Adams v. Haskell and Woods, directing that said Cohen and Edward Jones be imprisoned until they comply with a certain order of Court, requiring them to deliver to H. M. Naglee, a receiver appointed by said Court, all the books, papers, money and property in their hands belonging to Adams & Co.

And also a certain order of arrest, made by John S. Hager, Judge of *320the Fourth District Court, in a certain suit…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. Faircloth v. FairclothSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Galland v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. KuselWyoming Supreme Court · 1923

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API