Legal Opinion

Idaho Power Co. v. Hulet

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2004No. 29627PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This case involves a claim by Idaho Power Company of third party beneficiary rights under a lease contract entered into on September 13, 1999, between Jay H. Hulet and Mark and Shauna Comstock. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Idaho Power, finding such rights to exist. Jay H. Hulet appeals.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1998 and 1999 Idaho Power provided electrical power to Mark and Shauna Com-stock pursuant to their irrigation account. The account became delinquent and Idaho Power was unable to collect from the Com-stocks. On September 13, 1999,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Stewart v. Arrington Construction CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Eagle Water Co., Inc. v. Roundy Pole Fence Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Adkison Corp. v. American Building Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Partout v. HarperIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. American West Enterprises, Inc. v. CNH, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Clearwater REI v. Mark BolingIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. De Groot v. Standley Trenching, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Fenwick v. Idaho Department of LandsIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API