Valentino v. Elliott Sav-On Gas, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
In this case, we confront a fundamental issue in the interpretation of California’s settlement incentive scheme. May costs be shifted against a prevailing party who rejected a statutory settlement offer (under Code Civ. Proc., § 998) 1 that would have required this party to forego other lawsuits as well as dismissing the one involved in the case at trial? The trial court answered this question in the affirmative. Neither the language, legislative intent, nor policy justification of section 998 supports this interpretation. Accordingly, we are compelled to reverse.
Facts and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Randles v. LowryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
3Cited by30 opinions
- Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Goodstein v. Bank of San PedroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- McKenzie v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.