Legal Opinion

Valentino v. Elliott Sav-On Gas, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1988No. B019773PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

In this case, we confront a fundamental issue in the interpretation of California’s settlement incentive scheme. May costs be shifted against a prevailing party who rejected a statutory settlement offer (under Code Civ. Proc., § 998) 1 that would have required this party to forego other lawsuits as well as dismissing the one involved in the case at trial? The trial court answered this question in the affirmative. Neither the language, legislative intent, nor policy justification of section 998 supports this interpretation. Accordingly, we are compelled to reverse.

Facts and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Randles v. LowryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Goodstein v. Bank of San PedroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. McKenzie v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API