Legal Opinion

Larry Schaal, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. James A. Gammon, Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 14, 2000No. 99-3208, 99-3210PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The State of Missouri appeals from the judgment of the District Court 2 granting Larry Schaal’s petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The State argues that the District Court erred in finding that the state trial court violated Schaal’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights when it admitted into evidence an out-of-court videotaped interview. Cross-appealing, Schaal contends that the District Court erred in rejecting an ineffective assistance of counsel claim and in remanding the case to the state trial court. We affirm in all respects except as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richard Bugh v. Betty Mitchell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Stephen R. Snead v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. State v. SchaalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State ex rel. D.G.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API