Legal Opinion
Stephen R. Snead v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 11, 2004No. 03-2430PublishedCited by 220 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Stephen R. Snead appeals from the district court’s decision affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s (“Commissioner”) revocation of disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The Commissioner revoked Snead’s benefits to comply with statutory changes disallowing the award of benefits where alcoholism contributed as a material factor to the original finding of disability. Snead asserts that his other ailments, independent of his alcoholism, require an award of disability insurance benefits.
As we explain below, Snead presented evidence…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sharon K. COX, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Jerold H. Nevland v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by220 opinions
- Lance Stormo v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Cox v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Bertha Eichelberger v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Moore v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Kevin Byes v. Michael J. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.