Cranston v. New Process Fibre Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, J.:
The sole question raised for decision herein concerns the reasonableness of the period allowed by the quoted statute for the commencement of actions upon causes which had accrued prior to its effective date. Plaintiff attacks the six-months provision as being unreasonably short and argues that the former ¿three-year statute controls this case. Under his theory, the present motion would have to be denied since the action was started seven days less than three years after the last payment.
Certain basic principles are beyond dispute. A state may constitutionally reduce the time within…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McGahey v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Central Missouri Tel. Co. v. ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Steele v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Hathaway v. Merchants' Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Brown's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Cheswold Volunteer Fire Co. v. Lambertson Construction Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1983
- Boyer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Gulf Fertilizer Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1960