Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceSpence, J.
I concur in the reversal of the judgment, as I am of the view that under a proper construction of the statute before us, the evidence was insufficient to justify the exclusion of plaintiff from the racetrack. I also agree with the conclusion of the majority opinion that the rights of the parties must be determined under the statute rather than under the rules, as the board had no power by rule to provide for the exclusion of members of the public upon grounds other than those provided in the statute. I cannot, however, subscribe to the construction placed upon the statute in the majority…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- State v. TrubySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Greenberg v. Western Turf Assn.California Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. VallerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Jamison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.