Baker v. Martin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentJustice Mitchell
Only by focusing upon a single one-sentence section of one article of the Constitution of North Carolina — without proper regard for other sections of that Constitution — is the majority able to conclude that the challenged provision of N.C.G.S. § 7A-142 is constitutionally valid. As Justice Martin has demonstrated in his dissenting opinion in which the Chief Justice and I have joined, the majority errs in its view that Section 6 of Article VI of the Constitution of North Carolina applies only to “elections by the people to office.” Even if it is assumed arguendo that the majority is correct…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Millsap v. LozanoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Perry v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Morrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Alberti v. Manufactured Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.