Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Bible

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1912No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Case by Fred A. Chapman against John F. Bible and others for fraudulent representations. A judgment for defendant on a directed verdict is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendants in an action on the case to recover damages suffered by him by reason of the fraud, deceit and misrepresentation of defendants upon which he relied, whereby he was induced to purchase certain stock in the Ionia Wagon Company, a going concern, located at Ionia, Mich., engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling wagons and like products. •

Upon the trial of the case, at the close of plaintiff’s proof, on motion of defendants, the court instructed a verdict in their favor, upon which a judgment was entered. The case has been brought to this court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fargo Gas & Coke Co. v. Fargo Gas & Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Smith v. WerkheiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Page v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Jackson v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Steele v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Dickinson v. LawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Stout v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Nationwide Motorist Association of Michigan, Inc. v. Gurn Freeman and Jack FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API