Legal Opinion

In re Doe Children

New York City Family Court

Decided March 7, 1978PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Saul Moskoff, J.

The Commissioner of Social Services moves for an order: (1) requiring Flushing Queens Medical Associates (Medical Associates) to produce its records on the respondent, for use as evidence in this proceeding, and (2) requiring Ms. N., a counselor at Medical Associates to give testimony in this proceeding, and (3) permitting the petitioner to examine all of the urine test reports in the Medical Associates records on the respondent.

The motion to order the Medical Associates to produce its records on the respondent, for use as evidence in this proceeding is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Fred S.New York Family Court · 1971
  2. Schulman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. In re Three " John " ChildrenNew York Family Court · 1969
  4. In re Gigi B.New York City Family Court · 1972
  5. Schulman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Baby XMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. St. Bd. of Psychological Ex. v. HosfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In re Katherine C.New York Family Court · 1984
  4. Doe v. Daviess County Division of Children & Family ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In re Dwayne G.New York City Family Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API