Legal Opinion
Schulman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1975PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
Petitioners challenge, primarily on constitutional grounds, respondent’s requirement that a certificate of termination of pregnancy, a form whose execution is mandated by section 204 of the New York City Health Code, include the name and address of the patient obtaining the abortion. Appellant Dr. Harold Schulman is the director of obstetrics at the Bronx Municipal Hospital and appellant Jane *237Doe is the fictitious name of a patient on whom Dr. Schulman performed an abortion. At his patient’s behest, Dr. Schulman did not file a pregnancy termination certificate: Petitioners argue that the name…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Lora v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Falcon v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Perry v. FiumanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.