Schulman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
This is the second appeal in an article 78 proceeding brought to annul the New York City Health Code requirement that a termination of pregnancy certificate disclose the name and address of the patient. On the first appeal (41 A D *4832d 714) we remanded the case to Special Term for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court decisions in Roe v. Wade (410 IT. S. 113) and Doe v. Bolton (410 U. S. 179). After reconsideration, Special Term reaffirmed its prior decision and struck the requirement.
The essential facts are not in dispute. Petitioner Schulman is a duly licensed gynecologist and director…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Perry v. FiumanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People ex rel. Hickox v. HickoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re Doe ChildrenNew York City Family Court · 1978
- IND. FOUNDATION, ETC. v. Texas Ind. Acc. Bd.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.