Rogers v. Torbut
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Lee. Heard before the Hon. N. S. Graham. The case may be fully comprehended from the opinion. . No briefs came to Reporter.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The present record is in a very embarrassing condition. An original bill was filed by John C. W. Rogers, Anthony E. Rogers and Martha A.'Rogers — the last a married woman, suing by Anthony E., her husband and next friend. _ The bill charges usury in excessive form, and seeks to enjoin the sale of the mortgaged property under the power of sale contained in the mortgage, on account of the alleged usury. It claims no other relief.
The bill contains this clause: “ Your orators and ora-trix hereby offer to pay to the said E. A. Torbut such sum. as, after stating said account, shall appear to have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nelson & Hatch v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Peeples v. StollaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Cain v. GimonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Crews v. ThreadgillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. v. SewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Security Loan Ass'n v. LakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.