Legal Opinion

Davis v. Mitchell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 15, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

Defendant Linda Mitchell appeals from a judgment entered after a nonjury trial in the Superior Court (York County, Lipez, J.) establishing a boundary by acquiescence in favor of plaintiff Mary Davis and awarding Davis $3,200 for lost rental income and $1,689 for destruction of ornamental trees. Mitchell contends that the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence is not applicable to the facts of this case and also that it was not properly before the court. She asserts that some of the court’s factual findings are clearly erroneous and that the evidence is insufficient to support…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  3. Calthorpe v. AbrahamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. In Re Misty Lee H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. Grant v. Warren Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Deadwood v. Summit, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Dowley v. MorencySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Mealey v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. Crosby v. BaizleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Dubois v. Madison Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API