Legal Opinion

Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1350 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania petitions for review of a Public Utility Commission order which dismissed its complaint against the Commonwealth Telephone Company. We affirm.1

Mobilfone filed a complaint against a tariff filed by Commonwealth Telephone, a competing radio-telephone business. The complaint alleged that the rates in Commonwealth Telephone’s Supplement No. 60 to Tariff Telephone — Pa. P.U.C. No. 19 were non-compensatory, non-competitive, unreasonable and subsidized by all customers of Commonwealth Telephone’s landline operation. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Park Towne & Madway Engineers & Constructors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Executone of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kornafel v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Neal v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API