Legal Opinion

Executone of Philadelphia, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1980No. Appeal, No. 831 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Executone of Philadelphia, Inc. (Executone) petitions for review of the order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which terminated the PUC’s own investigation of tariffs filed by the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (Bell) and dismissed Executone’s complaint which alleged the rates set forth in those tariffs to be below cost, and thus in violation of law.

The subject tariffs proposed rates for three telephone service installations denominated COM-KEY 718, 734, and 1434. These systems are packaged key telephone systems having various line and station…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Petroleum Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. In Re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices, Etc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Retailers' Associations v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Yeager's Fuel, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Mobilfone of Northeastern Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API