Legal Opinion

Bolton v. Delta Air Lines

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 24, 2016No. Case No. 2:15-cv-965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MICHAEL H. WATSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) and Michele D. Parker (“Parker”) (collectively “Defendants”) seek the dismissal of Karen Ruzek Bolton’s (“Plaintiff’) complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(3) or, in the alternative, a change of venue under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404, 1406. Mot., ECF No. 3. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion on the ground that Plaintiff fails to state a claim.

I. FACTS

The following facts are taken from Plaintiffs Complaint, ECF No. 1.

Plaintiff, a resident of New…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Hahn v. KottenOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Central Ohio Building & Construction Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andre Williams v. USAA/Garrison Property and CasualtyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  2. Mitchell v. Fujitec America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  3. Yacko v. General Motors CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API