Legal Opinion
Bondyopadhyay v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 9, 2018No. 14-147Published
1Opinion of the Court
$ffi$fr!f,,i,qL llntbe @nite! $tsttd. ypt: otJFeDcrsl @taiml,rro (Filed: February 9, 2018) FEB - I 2018 ,< ***** d< * * ** * **** ****** rr f f * U.S. COURT OF {< FEDERAL CLAIMS PROBIR K. BONDYOPADHYAY, * Patent Infringement; 28 U.S.C. $ 1498; Summary Judgment; Direct Plaintiff, 'i' Infringement; Doctrine of Equivalents; Insubstantial Differences; Triple v. ''' Identity Test. THE UNITED STATES, ,. * Defendant. * i{ **** ** ** *** * {. **** {.* +* * * *** Probir K. Bondvopadhav, Ph.D., Houston, TX, pfS gg. Benjamin C. Mizer, Gary Hausken, and Alice Suh Jou, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pc Connector Solutions LLC v. Smartdisk Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Andersen Corp. v. Fiber Composites, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Del Mar Avionics, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Quinton Instrument Co., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.