Legal Opinion

Borman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1994No. 96266, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

This Court granted leave to appeal, limited to the issue whether § 2832 of the Insurance Code, 1 providing the form of the standard fire insurance policy, "prohibits an insurer from denying coverage to an insured who is innocent of wrongdoing based upon the wrongdoing of any other coinsured.” 444 Mich 935 (1994).

We hold that the provisions of the insurance policy issued by defendant State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., insofar as they deny coverage to an insured who is innocent of wrongdoing by another insured, are inconsistent 2 with the provisions of the standard policy, and, thus, contrary to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Fresard v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Morgan v. Cincinnati InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Lytle v. MaladyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Michelle Postell v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Turner v. Mercy Hospitals & Health ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. LaROSE MARKET, INC v. SYLVAN CENTER, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API