Legal Opinion

United States v. Greatting

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 6, 2008No. 07-0575/MCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court.

Staff Sergeant Christopher A. Greatting was the staff noncommissioned officer-in-charge of the K-9 Military Working Dog Section (K-9 Section) at Camp Pendleton. Consistent with his pleas at a general court-martial, Greatting was convicted of a number of charges arising from his supervision of the K-9 Section, as well as wrongful use of marijuana. At trial the defense moved for the military judge’s recusal because he had presided over four companion cases and had privately discussed certain aspects of those cases with the convening authority’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. QuintanillaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. ButcherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  4. United States v. LewisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. JarvisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  2. United States v. BremerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  3. United States v. GoodellU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API