Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 5, 1923No. 10,401PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

The defendants were convicted under an information charging them with manufacturing for sale and gift intoxicating liquors. Each of them was sentenced to pay a fine of $300.00. Of the numerous errors assigned only four are argued, and these only are determined.

1. It is said that the jury which tried the case was, over defendants’ objection, unlawfully impaneled. Six days before the time set for trial, counsel for defendants, to whom, at his request, the clerk had, as our statute requires, furnished the list of the regular jury panel summoned for the term, said to the court'that if, because of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. McInerney v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Solander v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
  4. Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  5. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  2. Honda v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  3. Burns v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Ellis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  5. Patton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API