Legal Opinion · Dissent

Compton v. Elliott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 23, 1932No. 993Published

1Dissent

I have concluded that the motion for rehearing should be sustained. The reasons, however, upon which my change of view is based are entirely different from those set forth in appellant's motion. My views more nearly accord with those expressed in the majority opinion — the little difference being just such, as it happens under the particular facts of this case, to require a different disposition of the motion.

My concurrence in the original opinion resulted from yielding my previously entertained views as expressed in Sims v. Callihan (Tex.Civ.App.) 39 S.W.2d 153, 158, as follows: "In such a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Coalson v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Richardson v. D. S. Cage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Oakland Motor Car Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Greenville Gas & Fuel Co. v. Commercial Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API