Legal Opinion

Goforth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1925No. 8539PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The conviction is for keeping premises for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Appellant and his co-indictee having failed to agree upon the order of trial, the court was in his rights in ordering that the appellant’s case be tried first. See Art. 727, C. C. P., Vernon’s Texas Crim. Stat., Vol. 1, p. 419; Terrell v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep. 647.

In charging that the appellant kept or was interested in keeping certain premise's, buildings 'and place for the purpose of storing, manufacturing, selling…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Broz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Coburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Boortz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Wolf v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  5. State v. MendezNevada Supreme Court · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API