Legal Opinion
State v. Mendez
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1936No. 3151PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] We feel that it is elemental that statutory rights may be waived by a defendant, and it is only in cases of constitutional rights that a question can arise as to whether or not a provision which was enacted for the benefit of the defendant may be waived. Patton v. United States, 74 L.Ed. 854; Conklin v. Sup. Ct.,36 P.2d 386.
Neither the name of Lawrence Bianchini nor the name of Richard H. Cowles, Jr., has ever been endorsed upon the information, and the order of…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States v. CelestineSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oili v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. St. FrancisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Valley County v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- Pendleton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Tubby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.