Legal Opinion

Lewallen v. Mays

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 19, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson —

Reversing.

The title and possession of about one-half acre of land are involved in this action.

Original surveys and patents were made in the name of Andrew Evans to the land of which the one-half acre is a part, or surrounding it, if it is not a part of the boundaries embraced in the patents. Nevertheless, the parties agree that Lewallen’s land lies wholly outside of the Evans patent. His farm is on the south side of Polar creek and the Mays’ farm on the north side.

The boundary of land to which Lewallen asserts paper title is contained in a deed dated…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Elam v. City of Mt. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Carter v. Elk Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Abbott v. PerkinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Hall v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Brock v. MuseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hejl v. WirthTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Tartar v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Watlington v. KaseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  4. Embry v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2006
  5. Combs v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API