Brock v. Muse
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Logan
Affirming.
This appeal involves a controversy over a line fence. The land of appellant, Brock, lies to the one side of an old 500 pole line, and the land of appellees, children of Minnie Muse, on the other side. There is no doubt that the line between the two farms, as shown by-the records, was a line running north 31 y2 west 500 poles with two white oaks as a point of beginning.
There was an old rail fence on, or near, the line between the two farms which existed for many years, probably for nearly a half century. The proof in the case established beyond all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garvin v. ThrelkeldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Elam v. City of Mt. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Cornillaud v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Hay v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Hopkins v. LayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Lewallen v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Wolf v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Edwards v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.