Legal Opinion

Napier v. Bertram

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 20, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 95-0250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

Gary Napier appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Daniel Bertram and from a judgment on the pleadings granted in favor of Charles Meese and A & N Services, Inc. (A & N). The issue is whether Napier, as a passenger involved in a taxicab accident, has a cause of action against the owner and the lessor of the taxi and the lessor’s insurance company and its agent for a failure to procure uninsured motorist (UM) insurance coverage for taxicab passengers. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1

On the evening of May 5,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gothberg v. NemerovskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Napier v. BertramArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Meineke v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API