Napier v. Bertram
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
Gary Napier appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of Daniel Bertram and from a judgment on the pleadings granted in favor of Charles Meese and A & N Services, Inc. (A & N). The issue is whether Napier, as a passenger involved in a taxicab accident, has a cause of action against the owner and the lessor of the taxi and the lessor’s insurance company and its agent for a failure to procure uninsured motorist (UM) insurance coverage for taxicab passengers. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1
On the evening of May 5,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Gothberg v. NemerovskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Napier v. BertramArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Meineke v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999