Legal Opinion

Hedrick v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1992No. WD 45436PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Chief Judge.

This case involves a court hearing under § 577.041.2 & 3, RSMo 1986, for the respondent driver’s refusal to submit to a chemical test. Section 577.041.2 requires the judge to determine only the following:(1) Whether or not the person was arrested;(2) Whether or not the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the person was driving a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition; and(3) Whether or not the person refused to submit to the test.

Section 577.041.3 then states that “[i]f the judge determines any issue may not be in the affirmative, he shall…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Aron v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. State v. WheelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Eckhoff v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Thurman v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Justice v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Hunsucker v. FischerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Garriott v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Endsley v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Endsley v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API